1. The SmartWatch 3 SWR50 which stands for only 50 of these will sell, powered by Android is more than a watch but less than a smart phone. It's got some of the features of a smart phone, and its on your wrist. That's the extent of it really. Their tagline is "useful information when you need it" and... yeah I guess that's accurate. The Apple Watch which stands for A Pleasantly Plump Little Electronic Watch Androids Terrible Come Here, is pretty much the same thing just the apple version.
2. The ability to almost be a smart phone.
3. A smart phone. Because it already tells me the time.
1) The Apple Watch is a smartwatch made to compete with higher-end watches while Sony is made to be a less expensive alternative to those who can only afford the lower-end Android phones. 2) I like how inexpensive the Sony watch is. I like how the Apple Watch is made from real premium materials like real sapphire or 18-karat gold. 3) I would get the Apple Watch since it would be compatible with my phone. Also, I'm not poor.
1) Apple.com which has a new product, that the release keeps getting delayed, called the iWatch. An expensive watch alternative that will be obsolete in three years. I mean, if you have a high paying salary and want to look like a tool (Kanye West) then this is the watch for you! The other watch is called the SmartWatch 3 SWR50 which is either a iWatch knockoff or just another Android wear device which is now all the rage in today's society to wear a phone device on your hand. Although they do have some cool feature like tracking your heart beat and reading your twitter feed usually the price of the device out weights the benefit.
2. Describe a feature from each watch you like? I like the ability that you have control over the music that plays on your phone or the notification alert system. I think those are some nifty features.
3. Which watch would be your choice? Explain why in detail. Although it is super overpriced and probably not worth the money, I would go with the iWatch because it does have added features that many of the other android devices do not include. Also since I have the iPhone 6 it would be more compatible with my device.
1. Describe both smart watches? Explain in detail. Both watches are basically the same, the only thing is the Sony watch has less features and is a little simpler. The Apple watch can do most of the things an iPhone can, and it is compatible with apple watches.
2. Describe a feature from each watch you like? I like the simplicity of the Sony watch, since they both look the same, I guess it wouldn't be a difference which one you got. I like the Apple watches because of the diversity of options.
3. Which watch would be your choice? Explain why in detail. I would choose the Sony watch because it's more affordable, even though I think Apple generally makes better products.
Both have relatively the same function. The main difference is that android wear is open source for development and apple watch has a closed environment that needs to have each app meticulously approved. This creates a more stable environment for the apple watch, but also severely cuts down on versatility. There are a couple hardware differences such as a heart-rate monitor in the apple watch, but the practical function of both is the same; to conveniently show the time and quick notifications. It is useful if your hands tend to be busy when you work, but you still need to be in the loop on what is happening with your phone. Smart watches are primarily a novelty, but in cases like this it can have a utilitarian use. Both have the same practical features, but I would rather have an Android Wear device because I could alter the device the suit my personal needs better.
1. Both watches do pretty much the same thing. The only difference is that the apple watch runs IOS software and the other one runs android.
2. I don't like the concept I mean why do you want a smart phone as a watch. I think its wasted resources on something that no one will buy such as me.
3. I would not buy either one because like I said I do not like either one. If I was given one I would want the apple one because I could sell it for more money and everyone wants apple products. (100 words)
1. The Smart Watch 3 SWR50 has a built-in GPS, has an impressive voice control system, and it is waterproof. This watch is slick and looks amazing, but it costs anywhere from $250 to $330.It is the first Smart Watch to use Google Android Wear operating system. This allows it to have more applications than the normal Smart Watch. The watch is also able to to store music, so that it can play music without being connected to a smart phone. The Apple Watch has a nicer and slimmer look to it, however, its cost ranges from around $350 to $17,000. Similar to many other Apple products, the consumer is paying more looks, not functionality. 2. The coolest feature about the Smart Watch 3 SWR50 is that you can use it without ever needing to actually look at the screen. Its voice control system is that advanced, that is can be used solely off of voice commands alone. The coolest feature of the Apple Watch is that it can be used to track your fitness. It keeps track of your steps and can keep track of your diet. 3. I would choose the Smart Watch 3 SWR50 because it is substantially cheaper than the Apple Watch. Also, it provides more of my favorite features that I have already talked about. My favorite feature of course being that it can be used without ever looking at the screen.
1. The apple and sony watch are both overpriced novelty times for people with to much money to spend. That said the sony watch can function as an ipod when not connected to the phone. This is basically just an extension of your phone so you don't have to take it out of your pocket. 2.Its cool that the sony watch actually functional as an ipiod and a fit bit so you don't have to pay for those. I do also like that apple is selling a 10 thousand dollar version of the watch to help normal people more easily identify douchebags. 3.This is the stupidest tech invention if seen I might buy one of thees when these are more than glamorized second screens for the smart phone but as of now Id spend my money on almost any other tech product or for gods sake just bu ya phone witch can do all this and actually has a screen you can see.
1.) The Smart-watch 3 SWR50 has a GPS built into it and looks pretty nice. It is also waterproof and is an Android smart-watch. These cost around $250-350 dollars. The Apple watch looks smaller and sleeker. and costing $350-17,000 dollars. Apple does what there best at, making their products cost ridiculous amounts of money.
2.) Something I would expect from Apple is to be simple, but yet with this product they are complex. I love the waterproof on the Android watch because it means you can take it anywhere basically.
3.) Android watch, simply because I find it to look nicer, it has underwater capabilities, and of course, its cheaper. Not to mention it looks a lot more comfortable.
1. The Sony Smart Watch 3 is an open source smart device strapped to the wrist of its user. It allows easy access to information and notifications transmitted by a compatible smart phone. The Sony Smart watch runs on an Android based operating system, and is left as "open source". As long as you have an Android or an iOS based device, you are able to use the smart watch. The Apple watch is a luxurious device that has the same use and utility that the Sony Smart Watch has, except it is not as versatile and universal. The Apple Watch as several requirements before you are able to use it, such as you have to have an iPhone to use it. Although the Apple Watch seems to be nicer and have easier uses, it does not offer as many features as the Sony Smart Watch.
2. The Sony Smart Watch 3 is powered by Android Wear, which allows it to be universal between all newer Android devices. The Apple watch offers better technical specs.
3. I would choose the Apple Watch, only because I have an iPhone. Although I would have buyers remorse and regret it, I'm sure it would satisfy my wearable device needs.
1. The Sony Smart Watch 3 is an open source smart device strapped to the wrist of its user. It allows easy access to information and notifications transmitted by a compatible smart phone. The Sony Smart watch runs on an Android based operating system, and is left as "open source". As long as you have an Android or an iOS based device, you are able to use the smart watch. The Apple watch is a luxurious device that has the same use and utility that the Sony Smart Watch has, except it is not as versatile and universal. The Apple Watch as several requirements before you are able to use it, such as you have to have an iPhone to use it. Although the Apple Watch seems to be nicer and have easier uses, it does not offer as many features as the Sony Smart Watch.
2. The Sony Smart Watch 3 is powered by Android Wear, which allows it to be universal between all newer Android devices. The Apple watch offers better technical specs.
3. I would choose the Apple Watch, only because I have an iPhone. Although I would have buyers remorse and regret it, I'm sure it would satisfy my wearable device needs.
1. The Sony Smart was to designed to be simple and easy to use while also remaining flexible in it's design through it's open source software and it's ability to easily design new software. Whereas the apple smart watch is meant to be as luxurious and flashy as possible while containing as many apple licensed apps as they could fit in it. The Apple watch requires you to have an iPhone, whereas the Sony watch does not have that requirement.
2. I like that the Sony Smart Watch utilizes Android open source functionality. I also enjoy that the Apple watch really goes with the iPhone well.
3. I would choose the Sony watch because I am a bit of an Android nut. I would spend some time tweaking the customization options.
1. The SmartWatch 3 SWR50 which stands for only 50 of these will sell, powered by Android is more than a watch but less than a smart phone. It's got some of the features of a smart phone, and its on your wrist. That's the extent of it really. Their tagline is "useful information when you need it" and... yeah I guess that's accurate. The Apple Watch which stands for A Pleasantly Plump Little Electronic Watch Androids Terrible Come Here, is pretty much the same thing just the apple version.
ReplyDelete2. The ability to almost be a smart phone.
3. A smart phone. Because it already tells me the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yioL7MRQvHM
Delete1) The Apple Watch is a smartwatch made to compete with higher-end watches while Sony is made to be a less expensive alternative to those who can only afford the lower-end Android phones.
ReplyDelete2) I like how inexpensive the Sony watch is. I like how the Apple Watch is made from real premium materials like real sapphire or 18-karat gold.
3) I would get the Apple Watch since it would be compatible with my phone. Also, I'm not poor.
1) Apple.com which has a new product, that the release keeps getting delayed, called the iWatch. An expensive watch alternative that will be obsolete in three years. I mean, if you have a high paying salary and want to look like a tool (Kanye West) then this is the watch for you! The other watch is called the SmartWatch 3 SWR50 which is either a iWatch knockoff or just another Android wear device which is now all the rage in today's society to wear a phone device on your hand. Although they do have some cool feature like tracking your heart beat and reading your twitter feed usually the price of the device out weights the benefit.
ReplyDelete2. Describe a feature from each watch you like?
I like the ability that you have control over the music that plays on your phone or the notification alert system. I think those are some nifty features.
3. Which watch would be your choice? Explain why in detail.
Although it is super overpriced and probably not worth the money, I would go with the iWatch because it does have added features that many of the other android devices do not include. Also since I have the iPhone 6 it would be more compatible with my device.
1. Describe both smart watches? Explain in detail.
ReplyDeleteBoth watches are basically the same, the only thing is the Sony watch has less features and is a little simpler. The Apple watch can do most of the things an iPhone can, and it is compatible with apple watches.
2. Describe a feature from each watch you like?
I like the simplicity of the Sony watch, since they both look the same, I guess it wouldn't be a difference which one you got. I like the Apple watches because of the diversity of options.
3. Which watch would be your choice? Explain why in detail.
I would choose the Sony watch because it's more affordable, even though I think Apple generally makes better products.
Both have relatively the same function. The main difference is that android wear is open source for development and apple watch has a closed environment that needs to have each app meticulously approved. This creates a more stable environment for the apple watch, but also severely cuts down on versatility. There are a couple hardware differences such as a heart-rate monitor in the apple watch, but the practical function of both is the same; to conveniently show the time and quick notifications. It is useful if your hands tend to be busy when you work, but you still need to be in the loop on what is happening with your phone. Smart watches are primarily a novelty, but in cases like this it can have a utilitarian use. Both have the same practical features, but I would rather have an Android Wear device because I could alter the device the suit my personal needs better.
ReplyDelete1. Both watches do pretty much the same thing. The only difference is that the apple watch runs IOS software and the other one runs android.
ReplyDelete2. I don't like the concept I mean why do you want a smart phone as a watch. I think its wasted resources on something that no one will buy such as me.
3. I would not buy either one because like I said I do not like either one. If I was given one I would want the apple one because I could sell it for more money and everyone wants apple products.
(100 words)
1. The Smart Watch 3 SWR50 has a built-in GPS, has an impressive voice control system, and it is waterproof. This watch is slick and looks amazing, but it costs anywhere from $250 to $330.It is the first Smart Watch to use Google Android Wear operating system. This allows it to have more applications than the normal Smart Watch. The watch is also able to to store music, so that it can play music without being connected to a smart phone. The Apple Watch has a nicer and slimmer look to it, however, its cost ranges from around $350 to $17,000. Similar to many other Apple products, the consumer is paying more looks, not functionality.
ReplyDelete2. The coolest feature about the Smart Watch 3 SWR50 is that you can use it without ever needing to actually look at the screen. Its voice control system is that advanced, that is can be used solely off of voice commands alone. The coolest feature of the Apple Watch is that it can be used to track your fitness. It keeps track of your steps and can keep track of your diet.
3. I would choose the Smart Watch 3 SWR50 because it is substantially cheaper than the Apple Watch. Also, it provides more of my favorite features that I have already talked about. My favorite feature of course being that it can be used without ever looking at the screen.
1. The apple and sony watch are both overpriced novelty times for people with to much money to spend. That said the sony watch can function as an ipod when not connected to the phone. This is basically just an extension of your phone so you don't have to take it out of your pocket.
ReplyDelete2.Its cool that the sony watch actually functional as an ipiod and a fit bit so you don't have to pay for those. I do also like that apple is selling a 10 thousand dollar version of the watch to help normal people more easily identify douchebags.
3.This is the stupidest tech invention if seen I might buy one of thees when these are more than glamorized second screens for the smart phone but as of now Id spend my money on almost any other tech product or for gods sake just bu ya phone witch can do all this and actually has a screen you can see.
1.) The Smart-watch 3 SWR50 has a GPS built into it and looks pretty nice. It is also waterproof and is an Android smart-watch. These cost around $250-350 dollars. The Apple watch looks smaller and sleeker. and costing $350-17,000 dollars. Apple does what there best at, making their products cost ridiculous amounts of money.
ReplyDelete2.) Something I would expect from Apple is to be simple, but yet with this product they are complex. I love the waterproof on the Android watch because it means you can take it anywhere basically.
3.) Android watch, simply because I find it to look nicer, it has underwater capabilities, and of course, its cheaper. Not to mention it looks a lot more comfortable.
1. The Sony Smart Watch 3 is an open source smart device strapped to the wrist of its user. It allows easy access to information and notifications transmitted by a compatible smart phone. The Sony Smart watch runs on an Android based operating system, and is left as "open source". As long as you have an Android or an iOS based device, you are able to use the smart watch.
ReplyDeleteThe Apple watch is a luxurious device that has the same use and utility that the Sony Smart Watch has, except it is not as versatile and universal. The Apple Watch as several requirements before you are able to use it, such as you have to have an iPhone to use it. Although the Apple Watch seems to be nicer and have easier uses, it does not offer as many features as the Sony Smart Watch.
2. The Sony Smart Watch 3 is powered by Android Wear, which allows it to be universal between all newer Android devices. The Apple watch offers better technical specs.
3. I would choose the Apple Watch, only because I have an iPhone. Although I would have buyers remorse and regret it, I'm sure it would satisfy my wearable device needs.
1. The Sony Smart Watch 3 is an open source smart device strapped to the wrist of its user. It allows easy access to information and notifications transmitted by a compatible smart phone. The Sony Smart watch runs on an Android based operating system, and is left as "open source". As long as you have an Android or an iOS based device, you are able to use the smart watch.
ReplyDeleteThe Apple watch is a luxurious device that has the same use and utility that the Sony Smart Watch has, except it is not as versatile and universal. The Apple Watch as several requirements before you are able to use it, such as you have to have an iPhone to use it. Although the Apple Watch seems to be nicer and have easier uses, it does not offer as many features as the Sony Smart Watch.
2. The Sony Smart Watch 3 is powered by Android Wear, which allows it to be universal between all newer Android devices. The Apple watch offers better technical specs.
3. I would choose the Apple Watch, only because I have an iPhone. Although I would have buyers remorse and regret it, I'm sure it would satisfy my wearable device needs.
1. The Sony Smart was to designed to be simple and easy to use while also remaining flexible in it's design through it's open source software and it's ability to easily design new software. Whereas the apple smart watch is meant to be as luxurious and flashy as possible while containing as many apple licensed apps as they could fit in it. The Apple watch requires you to have an iPhone, whereas the Sony watch does not have that requirement.
ReplyDelete2. I like that the Sony Smart Watch utilizes Android open source functionality. I also enjoy that the Apple watch really goes with the iPhone well.
3. I would choose the Sony watch because I am a bit of an Android nut. I would spend some time tweaking the customization options.